WebMay 5, 2015 · From the API, this is one of the ways to add rows: var dataTable = $ ('#dataTables-example').DataTable (); dataTable.row.add ( ['1','1','1' ]).draw (); Demo@ Fiddle Share Improve this answer Follow answered May 5, 2015 at 15:06 lshettyl 8,126 4 25 31 This works, but it is throwing a warning that cannot reinitialize Datatable. WebJust keep going with your code - you're on the right track: //call SQL helper class to get initial data DataTable dt = sql.ExecuteDataTable ("sp_MyProc"); dt.Columns.Add ("NewColumn", typeof (System.Int32)); foreach (DataRow row in dt.Rows) { //need to set value to NewColumn column row ["NewColumn"] = 0; // or set it to some other value ...
rows.add() with javascript Json — DataTables forums
WebSep 15, 2024 · After data is inserted into the new row, the Add method is used to add the row to the DataRowCollection, shown in the following code. … WebApr 10, 2024 · You were using subTable.row.add instead of table.row.add. Otherwise your code looks correct (Can't see what your actual columns are called because you are using a variable in the columns property) and this should work. Here is a working Fiddle example. You can use this: simon \\u0026 garfunkel the sound of silence
Add A class to tr when using add rows — DataTables forums
WebApr 6, 2024 · Sorry dude i'm on mobile and can't express myself very Wells haha. My actual problem is this, when someone clicks on the first table (The one with the 87 characters with id: "example") it's gonna prompt a method that does this: When someone clicks a row it it's going to extract the URL from the character selected and pass it to an AJAX call to fill the … WebIn your snippet you are reinitialize the DT, instead of use the already initialized table. To reuse the instance of DT to add data you should save the table in a variable, like rows.add (): Note, instead of parse the JSON, since your are in the JS, you should use as argument to the add () the array of objects. WebSep 20, 2024 · remove the DataTable, instead using a data-structure that either directly supports what you need (for example a concurrent collection), or which is much simpler and can be trivially synchronized (either exclusive or reader/writer) Basically: change the problem. Parallel.ForEach (strings, str=> { DataRow row; lock (table) { row= … simon \\u0026 garfunkel - the sound of silence